Here, it seems to be possible for the particle both to separate from and not to separate from the lexical verb when the object is replaced by a pronoun. With a Type I prepositional verb, the particle must not be separated from the verb ( called on them) if the meaning of the sentence is to remain unchanged.Ī further complication is that two verbs with different meanings can have the same lexical form compare the following sentences: With a Type II phrasal verb, the particle must be separated from the lexical verb ( turned it on) if the meaning of the sentence is to remain unchanged. The way to distinguish between the two types of multi-word verbs (for those with a good understanding of English) is to replace the lexical element following the particle by a pronoun: But most particles, such as on, can serve both as an adverb and a preposition, making this definition of little practical value. In principle, the difference between the two categories is that the particle in a Type II phrasal verb is an adverb while the particle in a Type I prepositional verb is a preposition. Sentence contains the Type I prepositional verb called on: the lexical verb called is followed by a prepositional particle, the preposition on. ![]() Sentence contains the Type II phrasal verb turned on: the lexical verb turned is followed by a phrasal particle, the adverb on. ![]() As can be seen from the examples above, the distinctions just outlined are sufficient to distinguish each subdivision from the others with one exception: the difference between a Type II phrasal verb and Type I prepositional verb is far from obvious:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |